chore: rename configuration language to modeling language #686
Conversation
|
| link: './configuration-language', | ||
| id: './configuration-language', | ||
| title: 'Modeling Language', | ||
| description: 'Learning about the FGA modeling language', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In docs/content/getting-started/immutable-models.mdx we use {ProductName}, here and in some other cases we use FGA - which do you prefer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that Andres strongly prefers {ProductName} because it means the content can be recycled.
| link: '../configuration-language', | ||
| id: '../configuration-language', | ||
| title: 'Modeling Language', | ||
| description: 'Learn about the {ProductName} Modeling Language.', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Elsewhere we seem to use sentence case, but here we use title case. I think sentence case is preferred, what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally we would pick one strategy and make it consistent everywhere, but let me know if I'm missing some nuance here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Section titles are going to be sentence case, yes. My plan is to slightly modify our current style guide for FGA purposes.
Description
Replaces "Configuration Language" with "Modeling Language"
https://openfga.github.io/openfga.dev/pr-preview/pr-686/docs
References
Review Checklist
main