-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-33283: Adjust NAD name to "network-xxx-xxx" when creating #13820
base: release-4.15
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Adjust new NetworkAttachmentDefinition name to be generated automatically and displayed in the Name input when creating a new NAD, to prevent creating a shared NAD between isolated namespaces. Add the popover to inform the user that "Networks are not project-bound. Using the same name creates a shared NAD." Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-22749
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22749 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33283. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33283, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/jira refresh |
@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33283, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/jira refresh |
@gouyang: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33283, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@gouyang: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33283, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@gouyang: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33283, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, openshift-cherrypick-robot, pcbailey The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/test e2e-gcp-console |
1 similar comment
/test e2e-gcp-console |
/hold Revision 731658a was retested 3 times: holding |
/test e2e-gcp-console |
2 similar comments
/test e2e-gcp-console |
/test e2e-gcp-console |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@metalice could you take a look at this again? |
@metalice it seems the PR cannot pass the e2e-gcp-console test before the conflict was found, could you take a look at this again because there is a request to backport this to 4.15. |
/test e2e-gcp-console |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #13568
/assign gouyang