Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: <carry>: OCPBUGS-25875: [4.10] vendor cadvisor to request the pid of another cont… #1847

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.10
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

haircommander
Copy link
Member

@haircommander haircommander commented Jan 8, 2024

…ainer if current pid is not longer valid

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

fix a bug where network metrics disappear after a container restarts

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


…ainer if current pid is not longer valid

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 8, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25875, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4053 to target a version in 4.11.0, 4.11.z, but it targets "4.14.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

…ainer if current pid is not longer valid

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@haircommander: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25875, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4053 to target a version in 4.11.0, 4.11.z, but it targets "4.14.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

…ainer if current pid is not longer valid

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

fix a bug where network metrics disappear after a container restarts

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and mfojtik January 8, 2024 18:24
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Jan 8, 2024
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link

@harche harche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2024
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@haircommander haircommander changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: OCPBUGS-25875: vendor cadvisor to request the pid of another cont… UPSTREAM: <carry>: OCPBUGS-25875: [4.10] vendor cadvisor to request the pid of another cont… Jan 11, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mrunalp mrunalp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@mrunalp mrunalp added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jan 11, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, harche, mrunalp
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mfojtik for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

4 similar comments
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2024

@haircommander: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp 0f23faf link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips 0f23faf link true /test e2e-aws-fips

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet