OCPBUGS-33331: Fix reference to $host_file

[cybertron]

I missed a spot when renaming this and it breaks host-specific configuration for br-ex.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cybertron: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33331, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

I missed a spot when renaming this and it breaks host-specific configuration for br-ex.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[cybertron]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cybertron: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33331, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @qiowang721

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[qiowang721]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron, qiowang721

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• templates/common/baremetal/OWNERS [cybertron]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4b809a4 and 2 for PR HEAD ca329fb in total

[cybertron]

/retest-required

[openshift-bot]

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33331, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @qiowang721

In response to this:

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-bot]

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33331, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.16.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[cybertron]

/jira refresh
/retest-required

This doesn't affect the GCP jobs so it can't be causing those failures.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cybertron: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33331, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @qiowang721

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/retest-required

This doesn't affect the GCP jobs so it can't be causing those failures.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8c9f1af and 1 for PR HEAD ca329fb in total

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ae3b3e1 and 0 for PR HEAD ca329fb in total

[openshift-ci]

@cybertron: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-techpreview	ca329fb	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-op-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-single-node	ca329fb	link	true	/test e2e-gcp-op-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/hold

Revision ca329fb was retested 3 times: holding