Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSDOCS-10291: CCM as optional capability (RNs) #75884

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: enterprise-4.16
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat commented May 13, 2024

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:
Optional cloud controller manager cluster capability

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877 (the specific page link in the output will be off until that PR merged into 4.16, but this will build without it)

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added this to the Planned for 4.16 GA milestone May 13, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 13, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 13, 2024

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-10291 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 13, 2024

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-10291 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 13, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Mon May 13 19:18:55 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://75884--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 13, 2024

@jeana-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 13, 2024

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-10291 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877 (the specific page link will be off until that PR merged into 4.16, but this will build without it)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 13, 2024

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-10291 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:
Optional cloud controller manager cluster capability

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877 (the specific page link will be off until that PR merged into 4.16, but this will build without it)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 13, 2024

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-10291 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:
Optional cloud controller manager cluster capability

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877 (the specific page link in the output will be off until that PR merged into 4.16, but this will build without it)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sunzhaohua2
Copy link

LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 14, 2024

@jeana-redhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-10291 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16

Issue:
OSDOCS-10291

Link to docs preview:
Optional cloud controller manager cluster capability

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
For #75877 (the specific page link in the output will be off until that PR merged into 4.16, but this will build without it)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.16 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants