Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v1.0.x] fix: modify olm-status-descriptor-test in scorecard #4088

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4009

/assign varshaprasad96

Modify `olm-status-descriptor-test` to not check the presence of
`status` field in CR, instead validate only if status-descriptors
are present in owned CRDs.
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2020
@estroz
Copy link
Member

estroz commented Oct 22, 2020

This doesn't quite fix the issue described in #3999

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 22, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jmrodri jmrodri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
the nit isn't worth fixing since the PR looks good.

# release notes and/or the migration guide
entries:
- description: >
Modify `olm-status-descriptors-test` to only validate if the status-descriptors are present in CRD.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: changelog should be past tense: Modified

@varshaprasad96
Copy link
Member

Once this is merged, #4093 can also be cherry picked

@estroz
Copy link
Member

estroz commented Oct 26, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 26, 2020
@varshaprasad96
Copy link
Member

closing this and opening #4141 instead with same changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants