Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement: Add instrumentation to allow warning on files that take long to format #989

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MTelling
Copy link

Before this PR

We have noticed the formatter becomes really slow on functions that nest a lot, causing some files to take +10 seconds to format.
A simple refactor can often fix these issues but it can be hard to identify and enforce that files are kept in a shape that formatter formats quickly.

This PR adds instrumentation to file formatting and, if enabled, prints errors to the console for files that exceed the specified threshold.

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==
Add instrumentation to allow warning on files that take long to format
==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

I'd rather fix the formatter here but that might take a lot more time and in places where we've seen issues, the code could use a refactor anyway (deeply nested code is not very pretty).

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ final class CommandLineOptions {
private final Optional<String> assumeFilename;
private final boolean reflowLongStrings;
private final boolean outputReplacements;
private final Optional<Long> warnOnExpensiveFileDurationMillis;
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would probably long term want to be able to set a failIfDurationExceeded option as well. Ideas for if this flag should be altered or if it's just another config?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just another config, imo

Morten Telling added 3 commits January 22, 2024 19:09
Copy link
Contributor

@ash211 ash211 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would be helpful for a project I'm working on where we are spending nearly as much time on spotless as we are on compilation!

  • 37m 15.661s on Spotless
  • 45m 5.492s on Compile

Comment on lines +22 to +24
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
String result = delegate.call();
Duration duration = Duration.ofMillis(System.currentTimeMillis() - start);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you have Guava on the classpath already, use Stopwatch?

@@ -185,6 +188,11 @@ boolean outputReplacements() {
return outputReplacements;
}

/** Returns the number of millis to allow processing of a single file to take before warning. */
Optional<Long> warnOnExpensiveFileDurationMillis() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be Optional<Duration> ?

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ final class CommandLineOptions {
private final Optional<String> assumeFilename;
private final boolean reflowLongStrings;
private final boolean outputReplacements;
private final Optional<Long> warnOnExpensiveFileDurationMillis;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just another config, imo

if (parameters.warnOnExpensiveFileDurationMillis().isPresent()
&& fileResult.duration().toMillis()
> parameters.warnOnExpensiveFileDurationMillis().get()) {
errWriter.println(path + ": took " + fileResult.duration().toMillis() + "ms to format, "
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: put WARN in this message, so it shows up when people Cmd+F for warnings (which log but do not fail builds)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants