You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the problem in doing it?
Making a new 0.3.7 release doesn't really have a lot of appeal to me. Am I supposed to repackage PEAR and update the docs and all that jazz when there aren't even any real code changes? Do I go to freshmeat.org and say "new version - no changes - i just like changing version numbers for fun!". Or maybe I have a brand spanking new 0.3.7 on composer and PEAR and all the downloads are still 0.3.6? That's gonna be great for confusion.
At best I'm thinking maybe a new 0.3.6a tag can be made. That tag can be unique to composer and 0.3.6 can be kept everywhere else. I guess. Assuming that this is really a problem? And if it is a problem... could someone perchance explain why?
Do keep in mind I'm not the biggest composer expect in the universe. If I was this wouldn't have been an issue in the first place lol.
0ea31d9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah. Kind of sucks that we have to list all of them seperately.
0ea31d9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you just re-release 0.3.6 to include this?
0ea31d9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0ea31d9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would have been better to push a 0.3.7.
0ea31d9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the problem in doing it?
Making a new 0.3.7 release doesn't really have a lot of appeal to me. Am I supposed to repackage PEAR and update the docs and all that jazz when there aren't even any real code changes? Do I go to freshmeat.org and say "new version - no changes - i just like changing version numbers for fun!". Or maybe I have a brand spanking new 0.3.7 on composer and PEAR and all the downloads are still 0.3.6? That's gonna be great for confusion.
At best I'm thinking maybe a new 0.3.6a tag can be made. That tag can be unique to composer and 0.3.6 can be kept everywhere else. I guess. Assuming that this is really a problem? And if it is a problem... could someone perchance explain why?
Do keep in mind I'm not the biggest composer expect in the universe. If I was this wouldn't have been an issue in the first place lol.
0ea31d9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer a retag of 0.3.6 rather than a 0.3.6a tag. I hate that notation.