Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lazy loading with react lazy instead of preact-async-route #372

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jose-donato
Copy link

Updated README.md to perform lazy loading with react lazy function (with examples) instead of the deprecated package preact-async-route.

Updated README.md to perform lazy loading with react lazy function (with examples) instead of the deprecated package preact-async-route.
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
function App() {
return (
<div>
<Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
Copy link
Member

@developit developit Jun 15, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a little wary of recommending this pattern. AsyncRoute transitions between two routes seamlessly by leveraging the fact that preact-router doesn't destroy and recreate routes if they're the same component. With lazy(), clicking a link immediately shows the fallback content ("loading..."), then flashes to the new route once loaded - fairly expensive.

Here's a demo showing the effect:
https://codesandbox.io/s/preact-router-372-bitsq?file=/components/app.js

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't agree with you. I think that happens because of naive component that we are providing ("loading...") completely different from the rest of the app causing the flash effect. Correct me if i'm wrong but if we provide a component congruent with the rest of the app i don't think it would be a problem. Besides suspense/code splitting this way is now recommended by React am I wrong?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides suspense/code splitting this way is now recommended by React am I wrong?

We're not React and we arguably have a stronger focus on performance. Suspense isn't good for code-splitting as it will very likely lead to wasteful rendering/diffing, that will be immediately thrown out. The concept itself is flawed, which is why we don't recommend Suspense to be used in production.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marvinhagemeister if not Suspense, then what would be a good approach for code splitting with preact-router? If the concept is flawed then why is leaving experimental status soon? (preactjs/preact#2915) Has your stance changed?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AsyncRoutes says it is deprecated and we should use Suspense/lazy instead...
@marvinhagemeister you recommend not to use lazy/suspense...
It feels like a vicious circle, isn't it ? 😅

@bestwestern
Copy link

I don't think preact-cli is using AsyncRoute? (perhaps the recommended "code snippet" could copy from preact-cli)

@bestwestern
Copy link

Is preact-async-route still the recommended way to do it?

@wahidshafique
Copy link

Is preact-async-route still the recommended way to do it?

Wonder the same thing...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants