New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix incorrect removal of parentheses when using an infer
with a constraint in a function predicate
#14279
Merged
Merged
Fix incorrect removal of parentheses when using an infer
with a constraint in a function predicate
#14279
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
#### Fix parens in inferred function return types with `extends` (#14279 by @fisker) | ||
|
||
<!-- prettier-ignore --> | ||
```ts | ||
// Input | ||
type Foo<T> = T extends ((a) => a is infer R extends string) ? R : never; | ||
|
||
// Prettier stable (First format) | ||
type Foo<T> = T extends (a) => a is infer R extends string ? R : never; | ||
|
||
// Prettier stable (Second format) | ||
SyntaxError: '?' expected. | ||
|
||
// Prettier main | ||
type Foo<T> = T extends ((a) => a is infer R extends string) ? R : never; | ||
``` |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
// #13275 | ||
type Foo<T> = T extends ((...a: any[]) => infer R extends string) ? R : never; | ||
type Foo<T> = T extends (new (...a: any[]) => infer R extends string) ? R : never; | ||
|
||
// #14275 | ||
type Test<T> = T extends (( | ||
token: TSESTree.Token | ||
) => token is infer U extends TSESTree.Token) | ||
? U | ||
: TSESTree.Token; | ||
type Test<T> = T extends (( | ||
token: TSESTree.Token | ||
) => asserts token is infer U extends TSESTree.Token) | ||
? U | ||
: TSESTree.Token; | ||
type Test<T> = T extends (new ( | ||
token: TSESTree.Token | ||
) => token is infer U extends TSESTree.Token) | ||
? U | ||
: TSESTree.Token; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bradzacher Is it possible to be longer/deeper?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it can be any deeper. I'm not 100% certain though. You could probably nest more conditionals in place of the
TSESTree.Token
- would be worth playing to see what's allowed syntactically.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems possible and I don't know how to fix, I'm going to pretend I don't know.
ac1aac1