Merge #11048

11048: Remove undefined cases from inputs to `all` function r=danielrbradley a=danielrbradley

<!--- 
Thanks so much for your contribution! If this is your first time contributing, please ensure that you have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) documentation.
-->

# Description
Using `all` currently looses type safety around the handling of input values which are possibly undefined. By adding the explicit undefined option to each argument, the undefined case outside the inputty type does not get captured.

By removing the explicit `undefined` cases, the undefined is captured by the generic parameter and correctly carried through to the output type.

For example, if an input to `all` is possibly undefined, the value after `all` won't be labeled as possibly undefined.

```typescript
// pulumi.Input<string> | undefined
let input = possiblyUndefinedInput();
// pulumi.Output<string>
let original = pulumi.all([input])[0];
// pulumi.Output<string | undefined>
let newBehaviour = pulumi.all([input])[0];

function possiblyUndefinedInput(): pulumi.Input<string> | undefined {
  return undefined;
}
```

## Checklist

<!--- Please provide details if the checkbox below is to be left unchecked. -->
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
<!--- 
User-facing changes require a CHANGELOG entry.
-->
- [x] I have run `make changelog` and committed the `changelog/pending/<file>` documenting my change
<!--
If the change(s) in this PR is a modification of an existing call to the Pulumi Service,
then the service should honor older versions of the CLI where this change would not exist.
You must then bump the API version in /pkg/backend/httpstate/client/api.go, as well as add
it to the service.
-->
- [ ] Yes, there are changes in this PR that warrants bumping the Pulumi Service API version
  <!-- `@Pulumi` employees: If yes, you must submit corresponding changes in the service repo. -->


Co-authored-by: Daniel Bradley <daniel@pulumi.com>

changelog/pending/20221017--sdk-nodejs--fix-ts-all-types.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+changes:
+- type: fix
+  scope: sdk/nodejs
+  description: Fixes loss of undefined type case in `all()`

sdk/nodejs/output.ts

@@ -577,14 +577,14 @@ function createSimpleOutput(val: any) {
  */
 /* eslint-disable max-len */
 export function all<T>(val: Record<string, Input<T>>): Output<Record<string, Unwrap<T>>>;
-export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined, Input<T3> | undefined, Input<T4> | undefined, Input<T5> | undefined, Input<T6> | undefined, Input<T7> | undefined, Input<T8> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>, Unwrap<T6>, Unwrap<T7>, Unwrap<T8>]>;
-export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined, Input<T3> | undefined, Input<T4> | undefined, Input<T5> | undefined, Input<T6> | undefined, Input<T7> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>, Unwrap<T6>, Unwrap<T7>]>;
-export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined, Input<T3> | undefined, Input<T4> | undefined, Input<T5> | undefined, Input<T6> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>, Unwrap<T6>]>;
-export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined, Input<T3> | undefined, Input<T4> | undefined, Input<T5> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>]>;
-export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined, Input<T3> | undefined, Input<T4> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>]>;
-export function all<T1, T2, T3>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined, Input<T3> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>]>;
-export function all<T1, T2>(values: [Input<T1> | undefined, Input<T2> | undefined]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>]>;
-export function all<T>(ds: (Input<T> | undefined)[]): Output<Unwrap<T>[]>;
+export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>, Input<T3>, Input<T4>, Input<T5>, Input<T6>, Input<T7>, Input<T8>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>, Unwrap<T6>, Unwrap<T7>, Unwrap<T8>]>;
+export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>, Input<T3>, Input<T4>, Input<T5>, Input<T6>, Input<T7>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>, Unwrap<T6>, Unwrap<T7>]>;
+export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>, Input<T3>, Input<T4>, Input<T5>, Input<T6>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>, Unwrap<T6>]>;
+export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>, Input<T3>, Input<T4>, Input<T5>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>, Unwrap<T5>]>;
+export function all<T1, T2, T3, T4>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>, Input<T3>, Input<T4>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>, Unwrap<T4>]>;
+export function all<T1, T2, T3>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>, Input<T3>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>, Unwrap<T3>]>;
+export function all<T1, T2>(values: [Input<T1>, Input<T2>]): Output<[Unwrap<T1>, Unwrap<T2>]>;
+export function all<T>(ds: (Input<T>)[]): Output<Unwrap<T>[]>;
 export function all<T>(val: Input<T>[] | Record<string, Input<T>>): Output<any> {
     // Our recursive `output` helper already does exactly what `all` needs to do in terms of the
     // implementation. Why have both `output` and `all` then?  Currently, to the best of our