Check for protect in replace chains #15776
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Changelog[uncommitted] (2024-03-25)Bug Fixes
|
Frassle
force-pushed
the
fraser/dbrprotect
branch
from
88d1bd1
to
c9c6f11
Compare
justinvp
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2024
...registry/CurrentUser/software/microsoft/csdevkit/v1/pids/90336_133558348214245590/values.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Frassle
force-pushed
the
fraser/dbrprotect
branch
from
c9c6f11
to
ebe3e0e
Compare
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2024
Tentative changelog: ### Features - [docs] Implement constructor syntax examples for every resource in typescript, python, csharp and go [#15624](#15624) - [engine] Send output values with property dependency information to transform functions [#15637](#15637) - [engine] Add a --continue-on-error flag to pulumi destroy [#15727](#15727) - [sdk/go] Make `property.Map` keyed by `string` not `MapKey` [#15767](#15767) - [sdk/python] Improve the error message when depends_on is passed objects of the wrong type [#15737](#15737) ### Bug Fixes - [auto/{go,nodejs,python}] Make sure to read complete lines before trying to deserialize them as engine events [#15778](#15778) - [cli/plugin] Fix installing local language plugins on Windows [#15715](#15715) - [engine] Don't delete stack outputs on failed deployments [#15754](#15754) - [engine] Fix a panic when updating provider version in a run using --target [#15716](#15716) - [engine] Handle that Assets & Archives can be returned from providers without content. [#15736](#15736) - [engine] Fix the engine trying to delete a protected resource caught in a replace chain [#15776](#15776) - [sdkgen/docs] Add missing newline for `Coming soon!` [#15783](#15783) - [programgen/dotnet] Fix generated code for a list of resources used in resource option DependsOn [#15773](#15773) - [programgen/{dotnet,go}] Fixes emitted code for object expressions assigned to properties of type Any [#15770](#15770) - [sdk/go] Fix lookup of plugin and program dependencies when using Go workspaces [#15743](#15743) - [sdk/nodejs] Export automation.tag.TagMap type [#15774](#15774) - [sdk/python] Wait only for pending outputs in the Python SDK, not all pending asyncio tasks [#15744](#15744) ### Miscellaneous - [sdk/nodejs] Reorganize function serialization tests [#15753](#15753) - [sdk/nodejs] Move mockpackage tests to closure integration tests [#15757](#15757)
Merged
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2024
Tentative changelog: ### Features - [docs] Implement constructor syntax examples for every resource in typescript, python, csharp and go [#15624](#15624) - [docs] Implement YAML constructor syntax examples in the docs [#15791](#15791) - [engine] Send output values with property dependency information to transform functions [#15637](#15637) - [engine] Add a --continue-on-error flag to pulumi destroy [#15727](#15727) - [sdk/go] Make `property.Map` keyed by `string` not `MapKey` [#15767](#15767) - [sdk/nodejs] Make function serialization work with typescript 4 and 5 [#15761](#15761) - [sdk/python] Improve the error message when depends_on is passed objects of the wrong type [#15737](#15737) ### Bug Fixes - [auto/{go,nodejs,python}] Make sure to read complete lines before trying to deserialize them as engine events [#15778](#15778) - [cli/plugin] Fix installing local language plugins on Windows [#15715](#15715) - [engine] Don't delete stack outputs on failed deployments [#15754](#15754) - [engine] Fix a panic when updating provider version in a run using --target [#15716](#15716) - [engine] Handle that Assets & Archives can be returned from providers without content. [#15736](#15736) - [engine] Fix the engine trying to delete a protected resource caught in a replace chain [#15776](#15776) - [sdkgen/docs] Add missing newline for `Coming soon!` [#15783](#15783) - [programgen/dotnet] Fix generated code for a list of resources used in resource option DependsOn [#15773](#15773) - [programgen/{dotnet,go}] Fixes emitted code for object expressions assigned to properties of type Any [#15770](#15770) - [sdk/go] Fix lookup of plugin and program dependencies when using Go workspaces [#15743](#15743) - [sdk/nodejs] Export automation.tag.TagMap type [#15774](#15774) - [sdk/python] Wait only for pending outputs in the Python SDK, not all pending asyncio tasks [#15744](#15744) ### Miscellaneous - [sdk/nodejs] Reorganize function serialization tests [#15753](#15753) - [sdk/nodejs] Move mockpackage tests to closure integration tests [#15757](#15757)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes #15763.
When doing a replace chain we need to check if the resources implicated for deletion in the chain are actually ok to delete (i.e. they don't have
protectset). This change fixes the step generator to check that when building the delete chain, and adds a test for it as well.Sadly because of the nature of the system you have to
state unprotectthese resources if you actually want them replaced, you can't just changeprotectin the resource options in the program. This is because at the point we're processing the "to be replaced" resource we've only got the old state for the implicated resource because we won't have got it's new goal state yet because it depends on the resource we're currently processing.Checklist
make tidyto update any new dependenciesmake lintto verify my code passes the lint checkgofumptmake changelogand committed thechangelog/pending/<file>documenting my change