Fix strict parsing for some Sequences

[sydney-runkle]

Change Summary

Handle this case properly, right now, it errors:

from typing import Sequence

from pydantic import TypeAdapter

assert TypeAdapter(Sequence[int]).validate_python((), strict=True) == ()

Related issue number

Fix #8604

Checklist

• The pull request title is a good summary of the changes - it will be used in the changelog
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Tests pass on CI
• Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
• My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

Selected Reviewer: @lig

[cloudflare-pages]

Deploying with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	e655b92
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://93cfa7fd.pydantic-docs2.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://fix-list-strict-validation.pydantic-docs2.pages.dev

View logs

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8614 will not alter performance

_{Comparing fix-list-strict-validation (e655b92) with main (3e87125)}

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

[sydney-runkle]

This is certainly not the most performant, but we already warn about the performance consequences of using Sequence[X] in the docs, so I'm ok with this change for now, assuming we implement the refactor for sequence validators in the future.

[sydney-runkle]

Please review