Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix bad node given to a message and false positive invalide format for __all__ #4953

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 13, 2021
Merged

Fix bad node given to a message and false positive invalide format for __all__ #4953

merged 4 commits into from Sep 13, 2021

Conversation

Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Member

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas commented Sep 1, 2021 •
edited

Type of Changes

Type
✓ 🐛 Bug fix

Description

Closes #4711

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added Bug 🪲 False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code labels Sep 1, 2021
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2021
Closed
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 2.11.0 milestone Sep 13, 2021
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 13, 2021 •
edited

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1230678290

  • 4 of 4 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.0005%) to 93.098%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1229683823: 0.0005%
Covered Lines: 13260
Relevant Lines: 14243
💛 - Coveralls

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit 9ec8cb9 into pylint-dev:main Sep 13, 2021
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the invalid-all-format-is-back branch September 13, 2021 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug 🪲 False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.11.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive finding for E0605: Invalid format for __all__
2 participants
@Pierre-Sassoulas @coveralls