-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expose warnings=
to pytester assert_outcomes()
#8952
Merged
symonk
merged 3 commits into
pytest-dev:main
from
symonk:add-warnings-outcome-checks-for-pytester
Jul 31, 2021
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -847,3 +847,14 @@ def test_testdir_makefile_ext_empty_string_makes_file(testdir) -> None: | |
"""For backwards compat #8192""" | ||
p1 = testdir.makefile("", "") | ||
assert "test_testdir_makefile" in str(p1) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_pytester_assert_outcomes_warnings(pytester: Pytester) -> None: | ||
p = pytester.makepyfile( | ||
""" | ||
def test_with_warning(): | ||
pass | ||
""" | ||
) | ||
result = pytester.runpytest(p, "--strict") | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Any preferred way to generate the warnings here? using a deprecated feature will create additional work later for someone when erroring it I guess, would like to minimise that if the test can |
||
result.assert_outcomes(passed=1, warnings=1) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm let's improve this by making the test itself generate the warning:
Let's not rely on
--strict
being deprecated, because then this test will break once we remove--strict
and will need to adapt it anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @nicoddemus see my other comment, you read my mind :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh we posted the comments at the same time, it seems. 😁
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
when i use your approach with pytester, the test fails w/o warning
(failed=1)
only , is there a way to get the outcome from running a test w/o runningpytester.runpytest()
?edit:
-W ::UserWarning
I think can sort itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh right, what happens is that we change all warnings into errors when running the pytest suite.
You can override that applying
@pytest.mark.filterwarnings("default")
totest_pytester_assert_outcomes_warnings
:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
every day is a school day, thanks