Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AOTI][torchgen] Add a few more fallback ops #126013

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: gh/desertfire/383/base
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Summary: They appear in some unit tests.

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 11, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/126013

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 2 Pending

As of commit 44e2eaa with merge base 6ffc94f (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request May 11, 2024
Summary: They appear in some unit tests.

ghstack-source-id: a43094695d11dcd7d3d94251054ffff2bbea4117
Pull Request resolved: #126013
Summary: They appear in some unit tests.

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
Summary: They appear in some unit tests.

ghstack-source-id: a7504a978aa82e385876b5c449bba6689b372c23
Pull Request resolved: #126013
@desertfire desertfire added the topic: not user facing topic category label May 13, 2024
@desertfire desertfire changed the title [AOTI] Add a few more fallback ops [AOTI][torchgen] Add a few more fallback ops May 14, 2024
@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 15, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command
For more information see pytorch-bot wiki.

@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "two pending CI jobs got stuck"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

smalltalkman pushed a commit to smalltalkman/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
Summary: They appear in some unit tests.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#126013
Approved by: https://github.com/chenyang78
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#125962
ZelboK pushed a commit to ZelboK/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 19, 2024
Summary: They appear in some unit tests.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#126013
Approved by: https://github.com/chenyang78
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#125962
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants