Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Benchmarking code to check for performance regressions #582

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Benchmarking code to check for performance regressions #582

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

busy-spin
Copy link
Contributor

@busy-spin busy-spin commented Dec 4, 2022 •
edited by chrjohn

Fixes #576

@busy-spin busy-spin mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2022
Open
@chrjohn
Copy link
Member

chrjohn commented Dec 12, 2022

Thanks for the PR @isurudevj , would it be possible to add a form of README.md or similar to show how the tests can be run?

@busy-spin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the PR @isurudevj , would it be possible to add a form of README.md or similar to show how the tests can be run?

hi @chrjohn added README.md file.

@chrjohn chrjohn changed the title Bugfix/issue 576 perf regression Benchmarking code to check for performance regressions Dec 19, 2022
@chrjohn chrjohn added this to the QFJ 3.0.0 milestone Dec 12, 2023
@chrjohn chrjohn mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2023
Open
@busy-spin
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @chrjohn

It was quiet a break between our last conversation. I have fixed the merge conflicts.
Kindly see if you can review and provide me feedback on new perf testing module.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@chrjohn chrjohn chrjohn left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
QFJ 3.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

including benchmarking code for QFJ within another module in the code base
2 participants
@busy-spin @chrjohn