Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor/test hooks #1767

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 13, 2021

Conversation

myNameIsDu
Copy link
Contributor

  • add ts-jest and modify jest config

  • transform test/hooks js files to tsx

ref: #1737

@myNameIsDu myNameIsDu changed the base branch from master to typescript-port July 12, 2021 15:01
@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jul 12, 2021

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 8404c7a:

Sandbox Source
Vanilla Configuration
Vanilla Typescript Configuration

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 12, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for react-redux-docs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 8404c7a

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/react-redux-docs/deploys/60ed79a0448aa4000832c74f

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1767--react-redux-docs.netlify.app


const Parent = () => {
const { subscription } = useReduxContext()
rootSubscription = subscription
const count = useSelector((s) => s.count)
const count = useSelector<DefaultRootState>((s) => s.count)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✋ Standard usage for useSelector is to either explicitly declare the type of s, or create a "pre-typed" version of the hook, per https://redux.js.org/usage/usage-with-typescript#define-typed-hooks .

Either of those is fine with me, but I'd appreciate changing over to those instead of using a generic in all of these.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's a great way to write it. Thank you for your advice

@@ -380,20 +406,30 @@ describe('React', () => {
const spy = jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {})

const Parent = () => {
const count = useSelector((s) => s.count)
const count = useSelector<DefaultRootState, number>((s) => s.count)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✋ Similarly, here the return type should be inferred correctly if the state is typed right

interface ParentContentProps {
parentCount: number
}
const ConnectedWrapper = connect<
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💬 here on the other hand, connect mostly requires the generics

@markerikson
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good!

@markerikson markerikson merged commit f1201de into reduxjs:typescript-port Jul 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants