add a new annotation ClassName to be used to indicate the real type of the parameters

[Mia0451]

Overview

Currently some functions in shadow(s) are using Object as the type of the parameter which is not 100% matched the function signature of the shadowed class.

Proposed Changes

Create a new annotation which could be used to denote the real type of those Object parameters.

[utzcoz]

@Mia0451 I recommend you switching to use comments to add types for these APIs instead of WithType. IIRC, there are some code use WithType, but I don't think it is proper to use WithType correctly.

I can merge this PR after switching to comments.

[hoisie]

Can you create a new annotation called @ClassName that is in the Robolectric annotations project? Same directory as @Implementation. That should be used instead

[Mia0451]

Created a ClassName annotation, almost same as existing WithType annotation.

[utzcoz]

@Mia0451 squash to one commit and use ClassName to replace WithType for your changes.

[hoisie]

This looks great! Can you squash the commits and then I can merge?

[Mia0451]

Hello utzcoz@ and hoisie@,
I just squared to one commit, but removed those ShadowXXX class changes, I plan to do it in next PR, is it ok?

[utzcoz]

np. LGTM.

[utzcoz]

@Mia0451 You need fix code style and commit message checking.

[utzcoz]

@Mia0451 The issue still exist. I think you need to learn what these tasks by checking Robolectric's workflow files.

[Mia0451]

got you, reading the error msg now.