Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade hashes dependency #690

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

tcharding
Copy link
Member

@tcharding tcharding commented Mar 26, 2024

Keep the range versioning but increase the threshold to include the latest v0.14.0 release.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

How is this related to #688? Did you mean #686?

@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

Just started for the day and at this second I can't remember exactly what I meant to link to. I think I meant to flag the discussion on whether we remove the range dependency all together.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Ah, right. My preferred choice is to merge 686 (dropping the impls on hash types) and then to keep the range dependency.

@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

Aight, I'll sort it out shortly.

Keep the range versioning but increase the threshould to include the
upcoming `v0.14.0` release.
@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

Rebase only, no other changes.

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 645271d

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

I'm gonna go ahead and merge this. I'm happy with the work we're doing in other PRs to make this work.

@tcharding tcharding closed this Mar 28, 2024
@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit d279c13 into rust-bitcoin:master Mar 28, 2024
21 checks passed
@tcharding tcharding deleted the 03-21-upgrade-hashes branch April 1, 2024 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants