Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Unrolled build for rust-lang#118649
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118649 - compiler-errors:coherence-ambig, r=lcnr

Make inductive cycles in coherence ambiguous always

Logical conclusion of rust-lang#114040
One step after rust-lang#116493

cc rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#20

r? lcnr to kick off the FCP after review... maybe we should wait until 1.75 is landed? In that case, I'd still like to get the FCP boxes checked sooner since that'll be near the holidays which means everyone's away.
  • Loading branch information
rust-timer committed Jan 9, 2024
2 parents a399117 + 8abf133 commit f3b1d7a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 6 changed files with 27 additions and 155 deletions.
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_lint/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -513,6 +513,11 @@ fn register_builtins(store: &mut LintStore) {
"converted into hard error, see PR #117984 \
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117984> for more information",
);
store.register_removed(
"coinductive_overlap_in_coherence",
"converted into hard error, see PR #118649 \
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118649> for more information",
);
}

fn register_internals(store: &mut LintStore) {
Expand Down
40 changes: 0 additions & 40 deletions compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ declare_lint_pass! {
BYTE_SLICE_IN_PACKED_STRUCT_WITH_DERIVE,
CENUM_IMPL_DROP_CAST,
COHERENCE_LEAK_CHECK,
COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
CONFLICTING_REPR_HINTS,
CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED,
CONST_ITEM_MUTATION,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4367,45 +4366,6 @@ declare_lint! {
@feature_gate = sym::type_privacy_lints;
}

declare_lint! {
/// The `coinductive_overlap_in_coherence` lint detects impls which are currently
/// considered not overlapping, but may be considered to overlap if support for
/// coinduction is added to the trait solver.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```rust,compile_fail
/// #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
///
/// trait CyclicTrait {}
/// impl<T: CyclicTrait> CyclicTrait for T {}
///
/// trait Trait {}
/// impl<T: CyclicTrait> Trait for T {}
/// // conflicting impl with the above
/// impl Trait for u8 {}
/// ```
///
/// {{produces}}
///
/// ### Explanation
///
/// We have two choices for impl which satisfy `u8: Trait`: the blanket impl
/// for generic `T`, and the direct impl for `u8`. These two impls nominally
/// overlap, since we can infer `T = u8` in the former impl, but since the where
/// clause `u8: CyclicTrait` would end up resulting in a cycle (since it depends
/// on itself), the blanket impl is not considered to hold for `u8`. This will
/// change in a future release.
pub COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
Deny,
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
overlap in the future",
@future_incompatible = FutureIncompatibleInfo {
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps,
reference: "issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>",
};
}

declare_lint! {
/// The `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` lint detects unrecognized or otherwise malformed
/// diagnostic attributes.
Expand Down
64 changes: 6 additions & 58 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ use crate::solve::inspect::{InspectGoal, ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor
use crate::solve::{deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics, inspect};
use crate::traits::engine::TraitEngineExt;
use crate::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt;
use crate::traits::select::{IntercrateAmbiguityCause, TreatInductiveCycleAs};
use crate::traits::select::IntercrateAmbiguityCause;
use crate::traits::structural_normalize::StructurallyNormalizeExt;
use crate::traits::NormalizeExt;
use crate::traits::SkipLeakCheck;
Expand All @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ use rustc_middle::traits::DefiningAnchor;
use rustc_middle::ty::fast_reject::{DeepRejectCtxt, TreatParams};
use rustc_middle::ty::visit::{TypeVisitable, TypeVisitableExt};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitor};
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE;
use rustc_span::symbol::sym;
use rustc_span::DUMMY_SP;
use std::fmt::Debug;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -197,7 +196,7 @@ fn overlap<'tcx>(
.intercrate(true)
.with_next_trait_solver(tcx.next_trait_solver_in_coherence())
.build();
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::with_treat_inductive_cycle_as_ambig(&infcx);
if track_ambiguity_causes.is_yes() {
selcx.enable_tracking_intercrate_ambiguity_causes();
}
Expand All @@ -224,61 +223,10 @@ fn overlap<'tcx>(
);

if overlap_mode.use_implicit_negative() {
for mode in [TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig, TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur] {
if let Some(failing_obligation) = selcx.with_treat_inductive_cycle_as(mode, |selcx| {
impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation(selcx, &obligations)
}) {
if matches!(mode, TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur) {
let first_local_impl = impl1_header
.impl_def_id
.as_local()
.or(impl2_header.impl_def_id.as_local())
.expect("expected one of the impls to be local");
infcx.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
infcx.tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id(first_local_impl),
infcx.tcx.def_span(first_local_impl),
format!(
"implementations {} will conflict in the future",
match impl1_header.trait_ref {
Some(trait_ref) => {
let trait_ref = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(trait_ref);
format!(
"of `{}` for `{}`",
trait_ref.print_trait_sugared(),
trait_ref.self_ty()
)
}
None => format!(
"for `{}`",
infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(impl1_header.self_ty)
),
},
),
|lint| {
lint.note(
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
overlap in the future",
)
.span_label(
infcx.tcx.def_span(impl1_header.impl_def_id),
"the first impl is here",
)
.span_label(
infcx.tcx.def_span(impl2_header.impl_def_id),
"the second impl is here",
);
lint.note(format!(
"`{}` may be considered to hold in future releases, \
causing the impls to overlap",
infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(failing_obligation.predicate)
));
},
);
}

return None;
}
if let Some(_failing_obligation) =
impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation(selcx, &obligations)
{
return None;
}
}

Expand Down
20 changes: 8 additions & 12 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -239,20 +239,16 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
}
}

// Sets the `TreatInductiveCycleAs` mode temporarily in the selection context
pub fn with_treat_inductive_cycle_as<T>(
&mut self,
treat_inductive_cycle: TreatInductiveCycleAs,
f: impl FnOnce(&mut Self) -> T,
) -> T {
pub fn with_treat_inductive_cycle_as_ambig(
infcx: &'cx InferCtxt<'tcx>,
) -> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
// Should be executed in a context where caching is disabled,
// otherwise the cache is poisoned with the temporary result.
assert!(self.is_intercrate());
let treat_inductive_cycle =
std::mem::replace(&mut self.treat_inductive_cycle, treat_inductive_cycle);
let value = f(self);
self.treat_inductive_cycle = treat_inductive_cycle;
value
assert!(infcx.intercrate);
SelectionContext {
treat_inductive_cycle: TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig,
..SelectionContext::new(infcx)
}
}

pub fn with_query_mode(
Expand Down
7 changes: 2 additions & 5 deletions tests/ui/coherence/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,18 +1,15 @@
#![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]

use std::borrow::Borrow;
use std::cmp::Ordering;
use std::marker::PhantomData;

#[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
//~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for type `Interval<_>`
pub(crate) struct Interval<T>(PhantomData<T>);

// This impl overlaps with the `derive` unless we reject the nested
// `Interval<?1>: PartialOrd<Interval<?1>>` candidate which results
// in a - currently inductive - cycle.
// in a -- currently inductive -- cycle.
impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
//~^ ERROR implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
//~| WARN this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out
where
T: Borrow<Q>,
Q: ?Sized + PartialOrd,
Expand Down
46 changes: 6 additions & 40 deletions tests/ui/coherence/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,51 +1,17 @@
error: implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:13:1
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for type `Interval<_>`
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:5:10
|
LL | #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
| --------- the second impl is here
| ^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `Interval<_>`
...
LL | / impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | where
LL | | T: Borrow<Q>,
LL | | Q: ?Sized + PartialOrd,
| |___________________________^ the first impl is here
| |___________________________- first implementation here
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>
= note: impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
= note: `Interval<_>: PartialOrd` may be considered to hold in future releases, causing the impls to overlap
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:1:9
|
LL | #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `PartialEq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Future incompatibility report: Future breakage diagnostic:
error: implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:13:1
|
LL | #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
| --------- the second impl is here
...
LL | / impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | where
LL | | T: Borrow<Q>,
LL | | Q: ?Sized + PartialOrd,
| |___________________________^ the first impl is here
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>
= note: impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
= note: `Interval<_>: PartialOrd` may be considered to hold in future releases, causing the impls to overlap
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:1:9
|
LL | #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0119`.

0 comments on commit f3b1d7a

Please sign in to comment.