Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

macOS: Use libc definitions for copyfile #123485

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

madsmtm
Copy link
Contributor

@madsmtm madsmtm commented Apr 5, 2024

COPYFILE_ALL is not yet exposed in libc, but the rest of what we need is, so use those definitions instead of manually defining them.

The definitions were added in rust-lang/libc#2667 and rust-lang/libc#3346.

`COPYFILE_ALL` is not yet exposed in `libc`, but the rest of what we need is, so use those definitions instead of manually defining them.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 5, 2024

r? @m-ou-se

rustbot has assigned @m-ou-se.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 5, 2024
@joboet
Copy link
Contributor

joboet commented Apr 8, 2024

Cool, thank you!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 8, 2024

📌 Commit 3fe5839 has been approved by joboet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 8, 2024
@joboet joboet assigned joboet and unassigned m-ou-se Apr 8, 2024
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
macOS: Use `libc` definitions for copyfile

`COPYFILE_ALL` is not yet exposed in `libc`, but the rest of what we need is, so use those definitions instead of manually defining them.

The definitions were added in rust-lang/libc#2667 and rust-lang/libc#3346.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123485 (macOS: Use `libc` definitions for copyfile)
 - rust-lang#123633 (Store all args in the unsupported Command implementation)
 - rust-lang#123638 (rustdoc: synthetic auto: filter out clauses from the implementor's ParamEnv)
 - rust-lang#123653 (Split `non_local_definitions` lint tests in separate test files)
 - rust-lang#123662 (Don't rely on upvars being assigned just because coroutine-closure kind is assigned)
 - rust-lang#123665 (Fix typo in `Future::poll()` docs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 9, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 3fe5839 with merge 033becf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 9, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: joboet
Pushing 033becf to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 9, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 033becf into rust-lang:master Apr 9, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 9, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (033becf): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 674.634s -> 672.287s (-0.35%)
Artifact size: 318.42 MiB -> 318.40 MiB (-0.01%)

@madsmtm madsmtm deleted the use-libc-copyfile branch April 16, 2024 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants