-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: weekly dependencies update #3896
Conversation
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ | |||
"@best/runner-remote": "^10.0.0", | |||
"folder-hash": "4.0.4", | |||
"markdown-table": "^3.0.3", | |||
"tachometer": "0.5.10" | |||
"tachometer": "0.5.10", | |||
"chromedriver": "^119.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ravijayaramappa Let's not add this dependency for everyone using this project. Otherwise it will break when you run Tachometer tests locally, because you probably have Chrome 120+ installed.
Here is my fix: #3897
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is a good point. Approved your PR. Will revert this change.
c414aa9
to
ce70f20
Compare
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ node_modules/ | |||
coverage/ | |||
.idea/ | |||
.project/ | |||
.nx |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something NX added in v17?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's right. https://github.com/nrwl/nx/releases/tag/17.0.0
core: update default cache directory to .nx/cache (nrwl/nx#19536)
I tried using the cacheDirectory
option, but the .nx/cache
directory still gets used.
ce70f20
to
d473a1f
Compare
d473a1f
to
a523107
Compare
Details
Routine update of dependencies
Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?
Does this pull request introduce an observable change?
GUS work item
W-14646095