Respect @uncheckedVariance in higher-kinded types (fixing 2.13.2 regression)
#8938
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SethTisue
added
the
prio:blocker
dwijnand
reviewed
May 4, 2020
A modification of `varianceInType` was necessary to propagate a boolean flag that controls the behaviour wrt `@uncheckedVaraince`.
joroKr21
force-pushed
the
unchecked-variance-in-hkt
branch
from
abef354
to
bacd612
Compare
SethTisue
removed
the
prio:blocker
SethTisue
changed the title
SethTisue
changed the title
@uncheckedVariance in higher-kinded types (fixing 2.13.2 regression)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A modification of
varianceInTypewas necessary to propagate aboolean flag that controls the behaviour wrt
@uncheckedVaraince.Fixes scala/bug#11968