Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Treat Future.apply as a non-batchable operation, for increased parall… #9129

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

viktorklang
Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang viktorklang commented Jul 21, 2020

…elism potential when used with BatchableExecutor

Not to be merged yet, used as background material for the conversation(s) in scala/bug#12089

…elism potential when used with BatchableExecutor
@scala-jenkins scala-jenkins added this to the 2.13.4 milestone Jul 21, 2020
@SethTisue SethTisue added the library:concurrent Changes to the concurrency support in stdlib label Jul 21, 2020
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

Since this remains background material for now, closing it for now to get it out of the PR queue. Discussion continues on the bug ticket and internally.

@SethTisue SethTisue closed this Oct 8, 2020
@SethTisue SethTisue removed this from the 2.13.4 milestone Oct 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
library:concurrent Changes to the concurrency support in stdlib
Projects
None yet
3 participants