Upgrade sbt-librarymanagement to 1.1.5 due to CVEs in its 1.0.x tree. #1770
+1
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you so much for your help with #1766 - the plug-in is now usable in enterprise!
However one of the dependencies did not pass the screening for CVEs - under bloop-backend there is sbt-librarymanagement 1.0.0 (see here for CVE info -- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.scala-sbt/librarymanagement-core_2.12/1.0.0 ). For an upgrade path, I checked 1.0.4 which is the highest in 1.0.x, but its dependency on jsch still has a CVE, so the next one up without dependent CVEs would be a 1.1.x series, of which 1.1.5 is the highest. The latest available overall is 1.7.0 but I imagine depending on that could potentially cause some breakages if e.g. we're using Bloop from SBT 1.4.x and using a librarymanagement from 1.7.x.
I was also wondering if the dep should aso be set as
% "provided"
as I'd expect it to be provided by SBT anyway.