Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Templates): Add esbuild to gitignore in aws-nodejs-typescript #10076

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 11, 2021

Conversation

ssshun
Copy link
Contributor

@ssshun ssshun commented Oct 11, 2021

In aws-nodejs-typescript template, thanks to #9962, lambda is packaged by esbuild instead of webpack.
Now, .esbuild directory is managed by git because .gitignore doesn't contain it.
This PR fixes gitignore to ignore .esbuild instead of .webpack.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #10076 (862e245) into master (39c09e4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #10076   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.41%   85.41%           
=======================================
  Files         333      333           
  Lines       13537    13537           
=======================================
  Hits        11562    11562           
  Misses       1975     1975           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 39c09e4...862e245. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@pgrzesik pgrzesik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @ssshun 👍

@pgrzesik pgrzesik changed the title Ignore esbuild directories instead of webpack fix(Templates): Add esbuild to gitignore in aws-nodejs-typescript Oct 11, 2021
@pgrzesik pgrzesik merged commit 865f21f into serverless:master Oct 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants