Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump @testing-library/jest-dom from 4.2.4 to 5.11.9 in /client #7

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 17, 2021

Bumps @testing-library/jest-dom from 4.2.4 to 5.11.9.

Release notes

Sourced from @​testing-library/jest-dom's releases.

v5.11.9

5.11.9 (2021-01-12)

Bug Fixes

  • Ignore comment nodes in toBeEmptyDOMElement (#317) (6a6531d)

v5.11.8

5.11.8 (2020-12-30)

Bug Fixes

  • Adds expected text for toContainHTML checks that fail (#299) (#318) (0bd1ed9)

v5.11.7

5.11.7 (2020-12-30)

Bug Fixes

v5.11.6

5.11.6 (2020-11-13)

Bug Fixes

  • Improved error messaging for toHaveFocus assertion (#304) (c79faa2)

v5.11.5

5.11.5 (2020-10-23)

Bug Fixes

  • treat shadow DOM elements as in the document (#298) (7ee54ab)

v5.11.4

5.11.4 (2020-08-22)

Bug Fixes

  • do not explicitly depend on jest assertion utils (#250) (2da8c71)

v5.11.3

5.11.3 (2020-08-11)

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 6a6531d fix: Ignore comment nodes in toBeEmptyDOMElement (#317)
  • f930668 docs: add obedparla as a contributor (#327)
  • c686a78 docs: Update usage in README to make it more copy-pasty (#326)
  • 70677a1 docs: add nickmccurdy as a contributor (#324)
  • 0bd1ed9 fix: Adds expected text for toContainHTML checks that fail (#299) (#318)
  • 4179117 fix: check equality in toHaveDisplayValue (fix #290) (#319)
  • 2927c95 ci: Add validate workflow instead of travis (#311)
  • 8298015 chore: fix jest-watch-select-projects (#309)
  • 0309dcf docs: add syneva-runyan as a contributor (#308)
  • c79faa2 fix: Improved error messaging for toHaveFocus assertion (#304)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Mar 17, 2021
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/client/testing-library/jest-dom-5.11.9 branch from 9b3892a to c784832 Compare March 17, 2021 11:04
@shadoo77 shadoo77 merged commit 3d4c574 into master Mar 17, 2021
@shadoo77 shadoo77 deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/client/testing-library/jest-dom-5.11.9 branch March 17, 2021 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

toHaveDisplayValue checks for substring rather than equality when passed string value?
1 participant