Add Drooble icon

[NovaGL]

Checklist

• I updated the JSON data in _data/simple-icons.json
• I optimized the icon with SVGO or SVGOMG
• The SVG viewbox is 0 0 24 24

@bhadaway manually converted the raster logo to vector from their Google Drive

Closes #3229

[bhadaway]

Okay, they are indeed in the middle of rebranding.

Their new logo is the one in which I derived the icon from, so we're good to go.

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Thanks for reaching out to them, @bhadaway; that's a big help 👍

Normally, I would suggest holding off on a newly rebranded logo until such a time as the rebranding is complete but as the only place they haven't rolled it out yet is on their website, I think we can proceed with this one.

[PeterShaggyNoble]

D'oh! Forgot to actually review this! 🙄

I am noticing some inconsistencies but, as proven in the past, I'm pretty bad at comparing raster to vector so I've requested reviews from a couple of the other @simple-icons/maintainers.

[bhadaway]

Done.

Official AI: https://calmestghost.com/drooble.ai

Updated SVG: https://calmestghost.com/drooble.svg

Correct Brand Color: #19c4be

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Many thanks for reaching out, @bhadaway 👍

[bhadaway]

You're welcome.

[ericcornelissen]

Thanks for the new source material @bhadaway, this looks good to me now. I took the liberty of updating the PR using your SVG as a basis. Since I did that I'll leave it to another @simple-icons/maintainers to have a look at this and merge it in 😃

[PeterShaggyNoble]

The new SVG is slightly off vertical centre; Inkscape shows it sitting at 0.002 on the Y axis, rather than 0. After fixing that, though, I'm seeing a couple of hairline differences (see examples in screenshots below, with @bhadaway's version in red). Both issues are probably just a result of the precision being too low, though.

[ericcornelissen]

Good thing I left it open for review, didn't check carefully enough after optimization 🙃

Before I push an update, how is the version below (precision 4 instead of 3):

<svg role="img" viewBox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><title>Drooble icon</title><path d="M12.001 9.998c1.104 0 2 .896 2 2s-.896 2-2 2-2-.896-2-2 .895-2 2-2zm11.998 2C24 8.036 20.951 4.742 17 4.439v7.559c.002 2.762-2.235 5-4.997 5.001-2.76.002-5-2.234-5.001-4.995-.001-2.762 2.235-5.001 4.997-5.002.688 0 1.37.142 2.002.417V.17C7.467-.935 1.275 3.467.171 10c-1.104 6.534 3.297 12.726 9.83 13.83 6.534 1.105 12.726-3.296 13.83-9.83.111-.661.168-1.331.168-2.002z"/></svg>

[bhadaway]

Just wanted to jump in one last time to make sure you're using the latest version (because @ericcornelissen's reply has the wrong code). You want:

<svg role="img" viewBox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><title>Drooble icon</title><path d="m12 10a2 2 0 1 1 -2 2 2 2 0 0 1 2-2zm12 2a7.58 7.58 0 0 0 -7-7.56v7.56a5 5 0 1 1 -3-4.58v-7.25a12 12 0 1 0 10 11.83z"/></svg>

I'm sure it's still not perfect though; is that even possible; do all the other icons in the set perfectly match their official logo? It seems like you would have to take some liberties to bend them to the will of the icon set, no?

Anyway, I'll leave it to the official contributors now, thanks for taking my suggestion, and it's an interesting process. At a later time, I may decide to properly clone the repo and get involved in a more meaningful way.

https://simpleicons.org/ has been a very vital tool in my arsenal for a while now. I jumped from one icon font to another, to premium SVG sets, blah blah blah, until finally finding something that stuck, with Simple Icons.

Thanks

[ericcornelissen]

@bhadaway I used the .ai file as a basis. I recal that I had to move it a bit, and I also optimized it (again?) using the SVGO CLI. Thanks for sharing your version as well, though. (I currently am not able to compare it)

I'm sure it's still not perfect though; is that even possible; do all the other icons in the set perfectly match their official logo? It seems like you would have to take some liberties to bend them to the will of the icon set, no?

In general, if there is an official vector source then that should be possible. And @PeterShaggyNoble compared my SVG to your SVG, which should match.

[NovaGL]

There are very tiny differences between the two SVGs, I believe it's good enough to be merged.

[PeterShaggyNoble]

With our new linting step, the build was failing on the previous version of the SVG. Upping the precision to 3 seems to solve all the issues so I've pushed an updated path using that (hope you don't mind, @NovaGL).

[NovaGL]

no problem. Sorry for being awol

[ericcornelissen]

It's all looking good now, thanks for the efforts @NovaGL @bhadaway, and @PeterShaggyNoble 🎉

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Yay, teamwork! 🎉 Thanks, everyone, for your collaborative efforts on this one.