-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix file info size check #476
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's specifically
undefined
and notnull
, but I figured it would be better to accept both?It's also never
0
(in the tests at least), I think before they are usingundefined
to indicate that the size hasn't been set yet. So potentially we want to remove0
? 馃There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Borewit The
.size
property is not documented to beundefined
. The docs should usenumber?
instead ofnumber
to make that clear.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LinusU Let's only check for
undefined
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just started looking into the failing tests as well. I noticed 2 things:
fileInfo.size
is, for some reason, not set reading from a file-stream (fs.createReadStream
) includes the original file path which is used to determine the file size)2. There are casesThe filefileInfo.size
isundefined
(because the stream length is not known), so that code needs to be improved.fileInfo.size
is overwritten toNumber.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
in case the length is unknown.I don't directly remember where the
0
is coming from. I will try to give some clarity on that and improve the documentation accordingly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue with size being 0 introduced here: https://github.com/sindresorhus/file-type/blame/331b1620c0d6a29b70a2e8e6c246cb2bdd93b183/core.js#L73
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the linter auto-fix assumed
.size
would be a number and neverundefined
. It doesn't read the types. The previous check was too loose anyway though, so it's good that we make it more strict now.