Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python: Provide python rules via CrossResolve. #316

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

DolceTriade
Copy link
Contributor

This allows rules_python's gazelle plugin to find python rules generated by rules_proto allowing for a fully gazelle'ified experience working with protos with Python.

Copy link

@ankit-gautam23 ankit-gautam23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@DolceTriade
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pcj Is this something that is desirable upstream?

@pcj
Copy link
Member

pcj commented Feb 17, 2024

Apologies for the long delay, yes this is desireable. Let's look to get it rebased.

This allows rules_python's gazelle plugin to find python rules generated
by rules_proto allowing for a fully gazelle'ified experience working
with protos with Python.
@DolceTriade
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased. Also ran gazelle.

@pcj
Copy link
Member

pcj commented Feb 20, 2024

LGTM.

Seems like the github actions CI setup needs to run gazelle and check for no diff.

@DolceTriade
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should I undo the irrelevant gazelle changes?

@pcj
Copy link
Member

pcj commented Feb 20, 2024 via email

@pcj
Copy link
Member

pcj commented Feb 21, 2024

CI is failing, but it's not due to this PR. I'm going to merge this and disable that test.

@pcj pcj merged commit c93e1f5 into stackb:master Feb 21, 2024
1 check failed
@DolceTriade DolceTriade deleted the provide_python branch February 21, 2024 01:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants