New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eslint plugin react hooks #67
Conversation
is it expected to see this PR merged any time soon? |
node_modules | ||
package-lock.json | ||
yarn.lock |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
node_modules | |
package-lock.json | |
yarn.lock | |
node_modules |
Instead of adding lock files to the gitignore I think it's better to add an .npmrc
file with package-lock=false
in it. Otherwise people will be using a lock-file locally, it just won't be synchronised...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with you, seems the owner of this PR doesn't know about programming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think a better solution would be to agree to use just one package manager to develop this and add it to a contributions
or requirements
section of the readme.
P.D: this PR just turned 1 year old 🥳
What's preventing this PR from being merged ? |
So I guess I should start a new PR, based on these changes and your remarks, but without the conflicts ;-) |
Did not know that, thanks for telling me! If you're creating a new PR, I have added the |
Here is the new PR to solve this issue, but without the conflicts ;-) |
added in #75 |
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix
[x ] New feature
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
eslint-plugin-react-hooks
.I saw the other PR was quite a mess for such small changes so I created a new one.
Which issue (if any) does this pull request address?
#57
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?