Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eslint plugin react hooks #67

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

vndre
Copy link

@vndre vndre commented Feb 11, 2021

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix
[x ] New feature
[ ] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

  1. Updated base config to use eslint-plugin-react-hooks.
  2. Updated test

I saw the other PR was quite a mess for such small changes so I created a new one.

Which issue (if any) does this pull request address?

#57

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Feb 11, 2021

🙌 Thanks for opening this pull request! You're awesome.

@ivanbanov
Copy link

is it expected to see this PR merged any time soon?

Comment on lines +1 to +3
node_modules
package-lock.json
yarn.lock
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
node_modules
package-lock.json
yarn.lock
node_modules

Instead of adding lock files to the gitignore I think it's better to add an .npmrc file with package-lock=false in it. Otherwise people will be using a lock-file locally, it just won't be synchronised...

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with you, seems the owner of this PR doesn't know about programming.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a better solution would be to agree to use just one package manager to develop this and add it to a contributions or requirements section of the readme.

P.D: this PR just turned 1 year old 🥳

@barroudjo
Copy link
Contributor

What's preventing this PR from being merged ?

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented Dec 1, 2022

What's preventing this PR from being merged ?

Screenshot 2022-12-01 at 12 22 12

@barroudjo
Copy link
Contributor

barroudjo commented Dec 1, 2022

So I guess I should start a new PR, based on these changes and your remarks, but without the conflicts ;-)
I'll get on it, it's high time standard-react uses these rules !
PS: non maintainers / author of the PR can't see what the conflicts are, so it's good you joined that screenshot

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented Dec 1, 2022

PS: non maintainers / author of the PR can't see what the conflicts are, so it's good you joined that screenshot

Did not know that, thanks for telling me!

If you're creating a new PR, I have added the .gitignore changes in #74, so no need to add that 👍

@barroudjo
Copy link
Contributor

Here is the new PR to solve this issue, but without the conflicts ;-)
#75

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented Dec 15, 2022

added in #75

@LinusU LinusU closed this Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants