New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated Models Page Grammar #7912
Conversation
Quickly went through the models' page in the documentation and updated some grammar as well as added some emphasis and brief clarification in a couple of places.
@cwray-tech you can update your local branch and it will reflect here automatically, no need to resubmit a pull request ;) |
@derrickmehaffy This shows you how unfamiliar I am with this! Will do, I thought later, maybe that is talking about a singular Strapi Model global id? If so, I could change it back to the way it was before. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## documentation #7912 +/- ##
=================================================
+ Coverage 19.14% 27.16% +8.02%
=================================================
Files 855 1163 +308
Lines 11933 15518 +3585
Branches 1898 2410 +512
=================================================
+ Hits 2284 4215 +1931
- Misses 8100 9535 +1435
- Partials 1549 1768 +219
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Quickly went through the models' page in the documentation and updated some grammar as well as added some emphasis and brief clarification in a couple of places. Signed-off-by: Christopher Wray <53663762+cwray-tech@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Wray <53663762+cwray-tech@users.noreply.github.com>
@derrickmehaffy is there anything I need to do to merge this? Thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description of what you did:
Quickly went through the models' page in the documentation and updated some grammar as well as added some emphasis and brief clarification in a couple of places.