Fix declaration-block-no-duplicate-properties syntax error
#6792
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 66b58b7 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
ybiquitous
changed the title
declaration-block-no-duplicate-properties syntax error
ybiquitous
requested changes
Apr 17, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@yoyo837 Thanks for creating the pull request quickly. Can you address my reviews, please?
ybiquitous
reviewed
Apr 18, 2023
Co-authored-by: Masafumi Koba <473530+ybiquitous@users.noreply.github.com>
yoyo837
commented
Apr 18, 2023
ybiquitous
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
close #6791
"No, it's self-explanatory."