doc: remove link to ES6 support runners #568
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Now that `tape` itself supports ES6, there is no need for “ES6 support with https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-tape-runner or https://www.npmjs.com/package/buble-tape-runner” anymore, so this item becomes misleading (suggests to the newcomer that `tape` still doesn't support ES6). Unless I'm wrong and there _is_ still some reason to use them? If so, maybe specify that reason.
|
tape supports ES Modules via I agree the caption could be reworded to explain this better. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that
tapeitself supports ES6, there is no need for “ES6 support with https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-tape-runner or https://www.npmjs.com/package/buble-tape-runner” anymore, so this item becomes misleading (suggests to the newcomer thattapestill doesn't support ES6).Unless I'm wrong and there is still some reason to use them? If so, maybe specify that reason.