Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v7.11.0 #457

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 13, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 7.8.0 -> 7.11.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 7.8.0 -> 7.11.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v7.11.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: deprecate prefer-ts-expect-error in favor of ban-ts-comment
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-assertions] prevent syntax errors on arrow functions
❤️ Thank You
  • Abraham Guo
  • auvred
  • Dom Armstrong
  • Kirk Waiblinger

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.10.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [sort-type-constituents] support case sensitive sorting
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-regexp-exec] fix heuristic to check whether regex may contain global flag
❤️ Thank You
  • auvred
  • Emanuel Hoogeveen
  • jsfm01
  • Kirk Waiblinger

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.9.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [explicit-function-return-types] fix false positive on default parameters
❤️ Thank You
  • Kirk Waiblinger
  • Sheetal Nandi
  • Vinccool96

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v7.11.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.10.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.9.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 13, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: bba5e03

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v7.9.0 fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v7.10.0 May 20, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v7.10.0 fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v7.11.0 May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants