Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fully supports progressive JPGS and Interlaced images for 3.x #394

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: 3.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

konnng-dev
Copy link

The intent of this PR is to introduce support to generate progressive JPEGs or interlaced images.

Couple days ago, the author of Intervention provided support to accomplish that https://github.com/Intervention/image/releases/tag/3.6.0

With that, I did some adjustments on Glide API to get the desired support.

Highlights:

  • Encode manipulator moved from the $manipulators list, because it needs to be the last manipulator to run when generating the images.
  • Encode manipulator now returns a EncodedImage. This change avoids to double encode image when generating it.
  • Encode also makes more use of Intervention enums to encode the image properly.
  • interlace parameter also was added to create progressive JPEGs or interlaced PNGs or GIFs.

@konnng-dev
Copy link
Author

konnng-dev commented Apr 22, 2024

TODO:

  • work on tests to check for progressive / interlaced images.
  • fix code formatting issues

@konnng-dev
Copy link
Author

@ADmad would you mind to take a look and tell me what you think?

I'm not sure if introducing this new encoding strategy would be the best for this package.

feedbacks are welcome :)

@ADmad
Copy link
Collaborator

ADmad commented Apr 27, 2024

Sorry I haven't had the time to look into this but could you please address the failing tests in the meantime.

@ADmad ADmad mentioned this pull request Apr 27, 2024
@konnng-dev
Copy link
Author

konnng-dev commented May 9, 2024

@ADmad I addressed all the issues that Github Actions was issuing.

Before setting this ready for review, could you point me the best place where I could add the tests for the progressive/interlaced images I am introducing?

src/Manipulators/Encode.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Manipulators/Encode.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ServerFactory.php Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Manipulators/Encode.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Api/Api.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@konnng-dev konnng-dev marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 13:03
@konnng-dev
Copy link
Author

@ADmad I added some comments to help the review process.

Ideally, it would be good to add tests for the new option added to the image API. But I don't have idea what would be the best place to put it.

break;
case 'gif':
case 'png':
$encoderOptions['interlaced'] = $shouldInterlace;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quality option isn't used for png/gif?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

src/Manipulators/Encode.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Manipulators/Encode.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Api/Api.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@konnng-dev
Copy link
Author

@ADmad I applied the suggested changes and also add a new doc entry for the new option. I'm just not sure how to preview documentation locally, but I guess it is following the same convention used before.

Also, do you have idea on how we could test this new feature? I just updated EncodeTest to comply with the recent changes, but I didn't have idea on how test that.

@konnng-dev konnng-dev requested a review from ADmad June 3, 2024 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants