Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix some flakiness in transparent_decompression test #6892

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

akuzm
Copy link
Member

@akuzm akuzm commented May 7, 2024

Add ANALYZE after compression. The plan changes are expected, SeqScans are preferred over IndexScans and Sort over MergeAppend for small tables.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.49%. Comparing base (59f50f2) to head (fae1d37).
Report is 174 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6892      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.06%   81.49%   +1.42%     
==========================================
  Files         190      198       +8     
  Lines       37181    36484     -697     
  Branches     9450     9528      +78     
==========================================
- Hits        29770    29731      -39     
+ Misses       2997     2820     -177     
+ Partials     4414     3933     -481     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@antekresic
Copy link
Contributor

Any reason not to merge this? Seems like it would improve things.

@akuzm
Copy link
Member Author

akuzm commented May 27, 2024

Any reason not to merge this? Seems like it would improve things.

There's still some flakiness that I'm investigating in #6893

So this means this PR is probably going to have some more changes. I plan to merge it first, and then merge the above fix, so that it's more clear what it's changing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants