Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(eslint-plugin): [explicit-member-accessibility] fix parameter properties bugs #912
fix(eslint-plugin): [explicit-member-accessibility] fix parameter properties bugs #912
Changes from 1 commit
257683c
1f10ff2
e7016c9
a366eaa
cbe3837
a81bb21
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that this should also check for
readonly
.public foo
is valid (otherwise it's not a parameter property), butpublic readonly foo
is notThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked
public readonly foo
in ASTExplorer using @typescript-eslint/parser, it showed that it is a valid AST.https://astexplorer.net/#/gist/462492e71de4506a8ece6dbd055d2196/4273aa53fae3642835f358371cda2fe08e350bed
Also if I were to add that check, if
parameterProperties='no-public'
, thenpublic foo: string
will pass as readonly is missing but still the access modifier is public.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For
explicit
:public foo
andpublic readonly foo
are both considered valid (obviously!)For
no-public
:public foo
is considered valid, because withoutpublic
, it's not a parameter prop.public readonly foo
is considered invalid, because you can remove the accessibility modifier, and it's still a parameter property:readonly foo
.We should probably document this in the readme so that it's a bit clearer, as I don't think that this is entirely intuitive.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've incorporated these changes, thanks a lot for putting these down. HAve added in the readme too :)