Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update custom server docs for async methods #30521

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

fmacherey
Copy link
Contributor

@fmacherey fmacherey commented Oct 28, 2021

as handle() returned from app.getRequestHandler() is a Promise, it has to be handled correctly. Simply returning it, works fine.

Bug

  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added
  • Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

Feature

  • Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
  • Related issues linked using fixes #number
  • Integration tests added
  • Documentation added
  • Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
  • Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

Documentation / Examples

  • Make sure the linting passes by running yarn lint

as handle() returned from app.getRequestHandler() is a Promise, it has to be handled correctly. Simply returning it, works fine.
@ijjk ijjk changed the title handle() is a Promise Update custom server docs for async methods Feb 6, 2022
Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch that we should be awaiting this method, I updated to await the others as well. Thanks for the PR!

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 560191a into vercel:canary Feb 6, 2022
natew pushed a commit to natew/next.js that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
as handle() returned from app.getRequestHandler() is a Promise, it has to be handled correctly. Simply returning it, works fine.


## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using fixes #number
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using fixes #number
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md

## Documentation / Examples

- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`


Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 8, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants