Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve output when using remote caching #2129

Open
ilovett opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #7697
Open

improve output when using remote caching #2129

ilovett opened this issue Sep 30, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #7697
Labels

Comments

@ilovett
Copy link

ilovett commented Sep 30, 2022

Describe the feature you'd like to request

It seems to be hard to determine if remote cache is even being used sometimes.

It might be great to add more explicit information on the output if remote caching is enabled

Describe the solution you'd like

When remote caching is enabled, show the number of jobs which were taken from local vs. remote

 Tasks:    3 successful, 3 total
Cached:    3 cached, 2 remote, 1 local, 3 total
  Time:    765ms >>> FULL TURBO

I'm not even sure if it's possible to have partial remote & partial local but I assume it would be at some point.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I used to see Remote computation something something experimental. I'd like to see sort of confirmation that that is enabled and working correctly, and especially if misconfigured, eg: expired token :/

@chris-olszewski
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, #2122 just added the remote caching log back and should be part of the 1.5.5 release.

@mehulkar
Copy link
Contributor

Yep this was just released in 1.5.5!

@nathanhammond
Copy link
Contributor

I'm reopening; I want to capture the local vs. remote distinction from this proposal in the final output summary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants