chore: make reproduction field a textarea

[benmccann]

Description

The reproduction field in the issue tracker asks for steps, but it's just a single line, so I can't include them.

Example: #10352

Additional context

This is discussed in #contributing on Discord

---

What is the purpose of this pull request?

• Bug fix
• New Feature
• Documentation update
• Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• Read the Contributing Guidelines.
• Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the Commit Convention.
• Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
• Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
• Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

[antfu]

I am not sure about it. I personally think having it as one line field shares the message that it requires a "link" to a repo or playground, but not "steps descriptions". Despite that, some might still open issues without repro, @patak-dev was even asking to restrict it with RegExp or so.

I consider your case is valid, but I think maintainers like us who already know the importance of repro and also know how to workaround the limitation could keep using the workaround. While leaving the form restricted to limit reporters who are not yet familiar with open source.

[bluwy]

I'm in favor with a textarea as I sometimes see repro steps placed inside the issue description. The placeholder for the field now is also "Reproduction URL and steps" so I think it's clear that they need the URL. We can also try to see if this change brings an uptick of repros without links too.

[patak-dev]

I'm with @antfu on this one after looking at the example that triggered this issue: #10352. This issue has a proper reproduction link.

What if we have an extra optional field after reproduction that is a Text Box: "Steps needed to reproduce (optional, if not clear or specified in the reproduction readme)" ?

[bluwy]

I'm fine with an extra optional field for steps too 👍

[sapphi-red]

Having an extra optional field for steps sounds better to me.

[benmccann]

An extra field sounds fine to me. I've gone ahead and made that change