Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

674 extract parameters #675

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ymajoros
Copy link

@ymajoros ymajoros commented Nov 8, 2023

No description provided.

@vladmihalcea
Copy link
Owner

Thanks, I'll review it when I have some time.

Copy link

@KENNYSOFT KENNYSOFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First of all, thanks, you saved my life!

I've added just one simple but important suggestion from my experience with these wonderful changes.
Also, you should copy these methods to hibernate-60 and hibernate-63 modules too.

I'm looking forward to this PR being merged, and released soon!

Comment on lines +104 to +105
Object value = queryParameterBinding.getBindValue();
parameterValues.add(value);
Copy link

@KENNYSOFT KENNYSOFT Apr 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Object value = queryParameterBinding.getBindValue();
parameterValues.add(value);
if (queryParameterBinding.isMultiValued()) {
parameterValues.addAll(queryParameterBinding.getBindValues());
} else {
parameterValues.add(queryParameterBinding.getBindValue());
}

If you call getBindValue to multi-valued binding, IllegalStateException("Binding is multi-valued; illegal call to #getBindValue") occurs.

Specifically, the extracted SQL of Hibernate 6.0+ using this class contains 'expanded' JdbcParameters. For example, given HQL below:

select team
from Team team
where team.isDeleted = ?1 and team.no in ?2

turns into (abbreviated) SQL as:

select t1_0.no from team t1_0 where t1_0.is_deleted=? and t1_0.no in (?,?,?,?)

when IN clause parameter has 4 items.

Copy link

@KENNYSOFT KENNYSOFT Apr 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah, if the IN clause parameter has 3 items (e.g., [1, 2, 3]) and it's padded to 4 items (e.g., (?,?,?,?); by configuring something like hibernate.query.in_clause_parameter_padding), bindValues still have 3 items so the size does not match.

I've found the key from the original code! Here is the working code fragment:

JdbcParameterBindings parameterBindings = ReflectionUtils.invokeMethod(
        plan,
        ReflectionUtils.getMethod(
                plan,
                "createJdbcParameterBindings",
                ReflectionUtils.getClass("org.hibernate.query.sqm.internal.ConcreteSqmSelectQueryPlan$CacheableSqmInterpretation"),
                DomainQueryExecutionContext.class
        ),
        cacheableSqmInterpretation,
        querySqm
);
return jdbcSelect.getParameterBinders().stream().map(b -> {
    JdbcParameterBinding parameterBinding = parameterBindings.getBinding((JdbcParameter) b);
    if (parameterBinding != null){
        return parameterBinding.getBindValue();
    }
    return null;
}).toList();
Kotlin version
val parameterBindings = ReflectionUtils.invokeMethod<JdbcParameterBindings>(
    plan,
    ReflectionUtils.getMethod(
        plan,
        "createJdbcParameterBindings",
        ReflectionUtils.getClass<Any>("org.hibernate.query.sqm.internal.ConcreteSqmSelectQueryPlan\$CacheableSqmInterpretation"),
        DomainQueryExecutionContext::class.java,
    ),
    cacheableSqmInterpretation,
    querySqm,
)
return jdbcSelect.parameterBinders.map { parameterBindings.getBinding(it as JdbcParameter)?.bindValue }

Copy the getSQLFromSqmQuery method and replace the code in if (jdbcSelect != null) block to the fragment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants