Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix compatibility with Docker 25+ #500

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

tbroyer
Copy link
Contributor

@tbroyer tbroyer commented Jan 25, 2024

Add support for OCI-compatible Docker images.

Fixes #498

Add support for OCI-compatible Docker images.

Fixes #498
@char-iot
Copy link

also fixes #452

@Kerwood
Copy link

Kerwood commented Jan 30, 2024

Is it backwards compatible ?

@mikesir87
Copy link

@Kerwood - I've confirmed this works with both the new format and is backwards compatible

@mikesir87
Copy link

For those currently stuck (and don't want to build it themselves), I did build and publish it under my namespace (and it's multi-arch!). Image here - michaelirwin244/dive

@fragaLY
Copy link

fragaLY commented Feb 2, 2024

When is it going to be released?

@wagoodman
Copy link
Owner

I'm shooting for today

@wagoodman wagoodman merged commit 5d6a406 into wagoodman:main Feb 2, 2024
6 checks passed

// 512 bytes ought to be enough (as that's the size of a TAR entry header),
// but play it safe with 1024 bytes. This should also include very small layers
// (unless they've also been gzipped, but Docker does not appear to do it)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a counter-example that's breaking this assumption, here's the layer from an image manifest that I've provided as a repro in #507

{
  "schemaVersion": 2,
  "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
  "config" { ... },
  "layers": [
    { ... },
    { ... },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.layer.v1.tar+gzip",  // <- This layer is gzipped
      "digest": "sha256:4f4fb700ef54461cfa02571ae0db9a0dc1e0cdb5577484a6d75e68dc38e8acc1",
      "size": 32 // <- this layer is also very small
    }
  ]
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to analyze the image using dive
7 participants