Add Starlark syntax

[Vasfed]

• I'm the package's author and/or maintainer.
• I have have read the docs.
• I have tagged a release with a semver version number.
• My package repo has a description and a README describing what it's for and how to use it.
• My package doesn't add context menu entries. *
• My package doesn't add key bindings. **
• Any commands are available via the command palette.
• Preferences and keybindings (if any) are listed in the menu and the command palette, and open in split view.
• If my package is a syntax it doesn't also add a color scheme. ***
• If my package is a syntax it is named after the language it supports (without suffixes like "syntax" or "highlighting").
• I use .gitattributes to exclude files from the package: images, test files, sublime-project/workspace.

My package is syntax highlighting for Starlark language.

There are no packages like it in Package Control.

[Vasfed]

@packagecontrol-bot please review

[packagecontrol-bot]

Automated testing result: WARNING

Repo link: Starlark
Results help

Packages added:
  - Starlark

Processing package "Starlark"
  - WARNING: '.sublime-syntax' support has been added in build 3092 and there is no '.tmLanguage' fallback file
    - File: starlark.sublime-syntax

[packagecontrol-bot]

Automated testing result: SUCCESS

Repo link: Starlark

Packages added:
  - Starlark

Processing package "Starlark"
  - All checks passed

[packagecontrol-bot]

Automated testing result: SUCCESS

Repo link: Starlark

Packages added:
  - Starlark

Processing package "Starlark"
  - All checks passed

[braver]

Well done 👍🏻

[deathaxe]

What's the main difference between Starlark and the syntax provided by https://github.com/niosus/BazelSyntax?

[braver]

Oh, nice find… one thing this new one has going for it is that it has the correct name 😁. Starlark is not limited to the Bazel project, it’s a language all on its own. .. Although I guess we did duplicate a bit now, the new one is probably much more findable (the old one doesn’t even mention Starlark).

[deathaxe]

But the older one looks way more complete and ST like, while the new one seems to be just a converted VS Code syntax.