New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: remove esModuleInterop from tsconfig (#110) #111
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The way TypeScript implements module imports is by following the ECMAScript module standard. In contrast, Node.js uses CommonJS, with
exports
andmodule.exports
. Since TypeScript is supposed to work for both Node and Browser (any JS runtime), it should by default follow the language standard of ESModules.For cases where the author wants to use the import syntax where the library being imported exports via CommonJS, TypeScript offers the
esModuleInterop
flag, to tell the compiler to treatmodule.exports =
as an ES modulesexport default
.This gets to the root of the issue. The ajv author is not adhering to the JS language's now-official ES Modules standards. See here and here, so in order to solve the issue I opened (#110), we have two possible approaches:
schema-utils
package so it no longer usesesModuleInterop
in its tsconfig, so we can ensure that any typescript definitions generated vianpm run build:types
will result in definitions which don't require direct or transitive consumers to also enable thisesModuleInterop
flagSo in order to solve the issue without any breaking changes to any package, I've made the change you commented on: replacing the ambiguous
import
withrequire
. Require has and will always be a CommonJS thing sharing no overlap with the ES Modules spec, so TypeScript can immediately interpretrequire
as a CommonJS import without the need for anyesModuleInterop
flag.If I didn't make this change to
require
, while still trying to remove theesModuleInterop
flag, then this repo'snpm run build:types
would have failed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alexleung let's add comments about it to code to avoid misleading for other developers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a comment above those two require lines.