ci: use x64 arch node 10.x for macos-latest #18359
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
For maintainers only:
|
alexander-akait
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
|
Thank you |
fengmk2
added a commit
to node-modules/github-actions
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
fengmk2
added a commit
to node-modules/github-actions
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
fix the integration CI fails on node 10.x running on
macos-latestlately.some context:
macos-latestnow runs on ARM chips macos 14 is only arm64 actions/runner-images#9741 (comment).so this PR specify architecture for node 10.x on ARM64 macos-latest as a workaround.
Did you add tests for your changes?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
What needs to be documented once your changes are merged?