Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use node:20-slim instead of node:20-alpine #73

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Use node:20-slim instead of node:20-alpine #73

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

pat-s
Copy link
Contributor

@pat-s pat-s commented Dec 31, 2023

as node20-alpine has issues with arm/v7

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Dec 31, 2023

@anbraten

This seems to work. The alpine version has apparently some issues on node20 which are unclear: build stalls without any output for arm/v7.

Using node-slim will increase image size a bit, but at least everything is working again - and the size increase shouldn't be too large (but didn't check in detail).

@pat-s pat-s changed the title try node:20-slim Use node:20-slim instead of node:20-alpine Dec 31, 2023
@6543 6543 merged commit 9b28e6d into main Jan 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@6543 6543 deleted the node20-slim branch January 18, 2024 18:32
@woodpecker-bot woodpecker-bot mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2024
1 task
@6543 6543 changed the title Use node:20-slim instead of node:20-alpine Use node:20-slim instead of node:20-alpine Jan 27, 2024
@woodpecker-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.0 🎉

The release is now available here

Thank you for your contribution. ❤️📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants