Quality analysis found the following errors: ### Problems * Insufficient Details: The report lacks specific details regarding the issue. It remains unclear why the user intends to automatically ignore all binary files. * Lack of Reproduction Steps: The report fails to provide steps to reproduce the issue. * No Expected versus Actual Results: The report does not delineate the actual outcomes and the anticipated results. ### Suggestions * **Add Detailed Description**: Provide more context and detail about the issue. Explain why it's necessary to automatically ignore all binary files, and how this problem impacts the system or the user experience. * **Include Reproduction Steps**: Include a clear, step-by-step guide to reproduce the issue. This can help others understand exactly what you're experiencing and aid in diagnosing the problem. * **Specify Expected and Actual Results**: Clearly define what you expect to happen and what actually happens. This contrast can help highlight the issue and make it easier for others to understand the problem you're facing. * **Referencing Other Issues**: When referencing other issues like '#1055', make sure to provide a brief summary of that issue in this report, to give readers an idea of the related problem without requiring them to navigate away from the current report. * **Add Screenshots or Logs if Possible**: If it's relevant, add screenshots, error logs, or any other additional information that could provide more context about the issue. * **Test on Different Environments**: If possible, test the issue in different environments (like different operating systems, browsers, devices) and include those details in the report. It helps to understand if the issue is specific to a certain environment or is more widespread. * **Suggest Impact and Severity**: While it's not mandatory, suggesting the impact and severity of the issue might help prioritize the bug fixing process.