Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat(Data Mapper): Refactoring deserialization for v2 #4800

Open
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DanielleCogs
Copy link
Contributor

@DanielleCogs DanielleCogs commented May 7, 2024

  • Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
    refactor

  • What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
    deserialization is easier to understand, and should have less bugs!
    Not completely done yet, so tests that are not passing are disabled

  • Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

  • Please Include Screenshots or Videos of the intended change:

image

image

@DanielleCogs DanielleCogs changed the title DRAFT: Deserialization refactor Feat(Data Mapper): Refactoring deserialization for v2 May 18, 2024
@DanielleCogs DanielleCogs marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2024 23:14
Copy link

Code Coverage Report

Code Coverage

Package Base Coverage New Coverage Difference
mapHandling 🔴 9.09% 🟢 83.54% 🟢 74.45%
utils 🔴 45.86% 🟠 51.37% 🟢 5.51%
Overall Coverage 🟢 21.06% 🟢 26.18% 🟢 5.12%

Minimum allowed coverage is 0%, this run produced 26.18%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants